MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804922886 · doi:10.1097/mnh.0000000000000426

Claudins and nephrolithiasis

2018· review· en· W2804922886 on OpenAlexafffund
Allein Plain, R. Todd Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBarrier Structure and Function Studies
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
KeywordsClaudinParacellular transportHypercalciuriaNephrocalcinosisTight junctionNephronLoop of HenleCalciumChemistryCell biologyEndocrinologyInternal medicineKidneyBiologyPermeability (electromagnetism)MedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The greatest risk factor for kidney stone formation is increased urinary calcium excretion. Most filtered calcium is reabsorbed from the proximal tubule and the thick ascending limb (TAL) of Henle's loop via a paracellular pathway. Claudins are tight junction proteins that confer the permeability properties of an epithelium. We review the contribution of renal claudins to nephron calcium permeability and how perturbations in these pathways cause alterations in tubular calcium transport, hypercalciuria, nephrocalcinosis, or nephrolithiasis. RECENT FINDINGS: Claudin-16 and Claudin-19 form a complex with claudin-3 enabling divalent cation permeability in the TAL. Claudin-14 interacts with claudin-16 to attenuate calcium permeability through this pore. Intronic mutations in claudin-14 increase expression causing hypercalciuria and kidney stones. A different type of TAL tight junction pore is composed of claudin-10b, which does not preferentially permeate calcium. Deletion of claudin-10b results in increased expression of the claudin-16/claudin-19 complex expressed in the medullary TAL and nephrocalcinosis. SUMMARY: Alterations to claudins expressed in the TAL tight junction greatly affects calcium homeostasis as highlighted by point mutations in claudin-16 or claudin-19 causing FHHNC or gain of function mutations in claudin-14 causing kidney stones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionSame topicBarrier Structure and Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207