MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2804957997 · doi:10.1002/cphc.201800309

IR, Raman, and Vibrational Optical Activity Spectra of Methyl Glycidate in Chloroform and Water: The <i>Clusters‐in‐a‐liquid</i> Solvation Model

2018· article· en· W2804957997 on OpenAlexafffund
Angelo Shehan Perera, Joseph Cheramy, Christian Merten, Javix Thomas, Yunjie Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemPhysChem · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsSolvationRaman spectroscopyChloroformChemistryLiquid waterSpectral lineMolecular vibrationInfrared spectroscopyPhysical chemistryChemical physicsComputational chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Molecular physicsMoleculeOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Solvent effects, in particular those involving water as the solvent, are of significant interest to the chemistry and physics communities. IR, vibrational circular dichroism (VCD), Raman, and Raman optical activity (ROA) spectra of methyl glycidate in two very different solvents, namely CCl4 and water, have been measured experimentally and simulated theoretically. The observed spectra in CCl4 could be well modelled using the polarizable continuum model for the solvent, whereas the situation is much different in water. The experimental VCD spectrum of methyl glycidate in water reveals strong induced VCD signatures in the water bending region, indicating the presence of the relatively long‐lived methyl glycidate‐watern complexes. We applied the clusters‐in‐a‐liquid approach to identify the dominant methyl glycidate‐water1,2 complexes which are the long‐lived species responsible for all the spectra observed in water. We examined the influences of solvent dielectric environment and the hydrogen‐bonding interactions on the conformational distribution of methyl glycidate. The geometry optimizations, frequency calculations, IR, VCD, Raman and ROA intensity calculations were performed at the B3LYP/6‐311++G(2d,p) and aug‐cc‐pVTZ levels of theory with D3BJ dispersion correction. It is particularly satisfying to note that the clusters‐in‐a‐liquid approach has captured all main experimental features in IR, VCD, Raman and ROA spectra of methyl glycidate in water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemPhysChemSame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207