IL-13 -1112 polymorphism and periodontitis susceptibility: a meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have examined the association between the IL-13 -1112C/T polymorphism and the risk of periodontitis. However, these studies have reached different conclusions. The aim of the current study was to investigate the link between this IL-13 -1112 polymorphism and susceptibility to periodontitis. METHODS: We utilized electronic databases, including the CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, to manually search for relevant research published through November 30, 2016. The Chinese and English terms used to search the literature included "periodontitis", "periodontal disease", "IL 13", "IL-13", and "interleukin-13". In accordance with our inclusion criteria, we selected studies that involved case-control trials. All of these case-control trials described their objectives, design and specific statistical methods. For all included studies, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were provided or could be calculated from the study data. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). STATA 12.0 was used to calculate the sizes of the combined effects and conduct a sensitivity analysis of the results. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 4 articles representing 5 case-control studies with a total of 710 cases and 671 control subjects. The meta-analysis results indicated that the CC vs TT model, CT vs TT model and TT vs CT + CC model (CC VS TT: OR = 0.615, 95% CI = 0.395-0.957; CT vs TT: OR = 0.518, 95% CI = 0.323-0.830; and TT vs CT + CC: OR = 1.739, 95% CI = 1.130-2.676) were significant in five IL-13 -1112 gene polymorphism and periodontitis susceptibility models. Subgroup analysis indicated that the CC vs TT, CT vs TT and TT vs CT + CC models were significant in the chronic periodontitis (CP) group, whereas no significant differences were found in the five aggressive periodontitis (AgP) group models. The sensitivity analysis showed that dropping any single study did not affect the pooled analysis results. CONCLUSION: The IL-13 -1112 polymorphism may be associated with susceptibility to periodontitis. The IL-13 -1112 gene polymorphism may be associated with susceptibility to CP but not to AgP. Thus, large-scale, multi-ethnic case-control trials are still warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".