Electronic structure with dipole moment and rovibrational calculations of the MgLi and MgNa molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigate an orderly study of the adiabatic potential energy curves for 29 and 30 low-lying 2s+1Λ+/− electronic states of the molecules MgLi and MgNa, respectively. The calculation has been done by using the complete active space self-consistent field followed by multi-reference configuration interaction with Davidson correction. For the investigated electronic states, the static and transition dipole moment curves are calculated along with the Einstein coefficients, the emission oscillator strength, the spontaneous radiative lifetime, the line strength, the classical radiative decay rate of the single-electron oscillator, the spectroscopic constants (Te, ωe, ωexe, Be, Re), and the equilibrium dissociation energy De. By means of the canonical functions approach, the ro-vibrational constants Ev, Bv, Dv, and the abscissas of the turning points, Rmin and Rmax, have been calculated for the considered electronic states up to the vibrational level v = 79. The Franck–Condon factors have been calculated and plotted for the transition between the low-lying electronic states of the two considered molecules. A good agreement is revealed between our calculated values and those available in the literature. Fifty new electronic states are investigated in the present work for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".