Conjunctival Squamous Neoplasia: Staging and Initial Treatment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification in the initial management of squamous neoplasia of the conjunctiva. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 95 histopathologically proven cases of treatment-naive conjunctival squamous neoplasia. Tumors were classified into 4 histological groups: conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with mild dysplasia (grade 1/3), moderate dysplasia (grade 2/3), severe dysplasia (grade 3/3 or carcinoma in situ), and invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Clinical findings such as tumor location, largest basal diameter, growth pattern, and adjacent structures involved were recorded. RESULTS: CIN was observed in 74 cases (78%), and SCC was noted in 21 cases (22%). Based on the AJCC classification, all the 74 cases of CIN were classified as Tis (tumor in situ). Among the invasive SCC, there were 3 T1 tumors, 2 T2 tumors, and 16 T3 tumors. Complete excision with or without adjuvant therapy was selected as initial treatment in 80% of cases (76/95). Two cases of SCC with scleral invasion were treated using brachytherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC stage does not correlate with the initial treatment of CIN. The AJCC T3 category should be reviewed to differentiate diffuse SCCs with broad surface extension from tumors with deep scleral invasion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it