MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mathematical Modeling of Skeletal Muscle Focal Adhesion Kinase Signaling in Response to Contraction

2018· article· en· W2805269235 on OpenAlexaff
Sida Zhao, David C. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocal adhesionContraction (grammar)Skeletal muscleMuscle contractionPTK2KinaseCell biologyChemistrySignal transductionBiologyAnatomyProtein kinase AEndocrinologyMitogen-activated protein kinase kinase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Force is a stimulus of resistance exercise (RE) that prompts adaptations to muscle size. Force acts at the molecular level on mechanotransducers such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which is a tyrosine kinase that undergoes a conformational change in response to force and subsequently activates a signaling cascade that controls the rate of protein synthesis. The dynamics by which FAK signaling transduces mechanical forces into chemical signals to induce hypertrophy are unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop and analyze a mathematical model of skeletal-muscle FAK signaling in response to contractions. METHODS: The model was expressed as a system of ordinary differential equations incorporating signaling proteins involved in the control of protein translation (the FAK/ERK1/2/TSC2 axis). Intracellular biochemical reactions were represented by mass-action or Michaelis-Menten kinetics. We constructed the model by amalgamating a published model of FAK signaling [Zhou et al. (2015) PLoS Comput Biol] and ERK1/2 signaling [Hatakeyama et al. (2003) Biochem J]. We calibrated the kinetic parameters of the Zhou et al. and Hatakeyama et al. models to reflect skeletal muscle cells. RESULTS: Our model outputs qualitatively agreed with published time-course data for FAK, ERK1/2, and TSC2 following the simulation of muscle force contraction profiles. Specifically, we simulated thirty contraction cycles featuring 15-pN contractions and 3 sec per contraction followed by 7 sec of rest [Ato et al. (2016) Physiol Rep], which led to increased ERK1/2 signaling lasting ~3.5 hrs. Parameter sensitivity analysis determined that the model was most sensitive to parameters that described the force-induced rate of conformational change for FAK. We also simulated various force inputs for the contraction protocol described above and observed that ERK1/2 signaling was responsive to forces between 8-15 pN, achieving a plateau for higher forces. CONCLUSION: Our model provides a working quantitative hypothesis of the dynamics of protein translational control in skeletal muscle induced by mechanical factors. Going forward we will use the model to study the effects that different RE variables (repetitions, sets, loads, rest, etc.) have on FAK signaling dynamics by simulating different contraction profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207