Numerical Simulation on the Anti-fouling Property of Helical Blade Rotors in Circular Tube
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inferior heat transfer efficiency and severe fouling precipitation have been the troublesome problems for shell-and-tube heat exchangers. As a typical type of tube insert, the helical blade rotors (HBRs) can achieve heat transfer augmentation and fouling mitigation in heat exchanger. In this work, the numerical simulation regarding to the anti-fouling property of HBRs in circular tube was conducted. The numerical method was verified accurate in comparison with the results in literature prior to the simulation. The results showed that in the process of the crystallization of the fouling the deposition rate decreased and the removal rate increased, and eventually they tended to be stable and reached a dynamic balance; the deposition rate, the removal rate, the net rate and the thermal resistance in tube with HBRs was lower than that in smooth tube, which means that inserting HBRs into the circular tube can effectively prevent the deposition of crystallization fouling; moreover, the mass fraction of CaCl 2 in tube with HBRs was lower than that in smooth tube, and in tube with HBRs it was not just lower near the tube wall but also near the HBRs, which illustrate that the HBRs can enhance the mass transfer of Ca 2+ in circular tube, and the mass transfer of Ca 2+ towards the HBRs is enhanced, while the mass transfer towards the tube wall is weakened.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it