MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2805396646 · doi:10.1177/2513826x17751117

Synovial Chondromatosis in the Metacarpophalangeal Joint

2018· article· en· W2805396646 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Casey Thorburn, John E. Hopkins, Donald N. Cook, Shane K. F. Seal

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery Case Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences CentreMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynovial chondromatosisMedicineMetacarpophalangeal jointPathologicalMagnetic resonance imagingJoint effusionRadiologyWristSynovectomyRange of motionEffusionPresentation (obstetrics)Physical examinationSurgeryPathologyRheumatoid arthritisThumbInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synovial chondromatosis (SC) is a benign proliferative metaplasia of joint synovium into cartilaginous tissue. The relative scarcity of presentation in the wrist or hands contributes to the difficulties in accurately diagnosing and obtaining the necessary treatment for SC. We present a 43-year-old man with a 10-month history of stiffness and decreased range of motion of his right first metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. On examination, a firm mass was palpated surrounding his MCP joint. X-rays showed only a joint effusion. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed an effusion, high signal intensity joint distension, and small erosions. Surgical exploration and complete synovectomy with excision of loose bodies was performed. The pathological diagnosis, based on the clinical examination as well as MRI, was consistent with that of tenosynovial chondromatosis. This case illustrates surgical exploration and pathological investigations may be necessary for SC diagnosis. The literature was reviewed for greater understanding of SC’s presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic Surgery Case StudiesSame topicMusculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207