MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow, Oxygen Extraction and Consumption in Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

2018· article· en· W2806117081 on OpenAlexaff
Amy A. Kirkham, D. Ian Paterson, Edith Pituskin, Justin Grenier, Esther Yang, Richard B. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMedicineBlood flowChemotherapySkeletal muscleInternal medicineConsumption (sociology)OncologyExtraction (chemistry)CancerChemistryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Cardiac muscle injury is a well-recognized side effect of anthracycline chemotherapy and trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer. Preclinical studies have identified parallels in cell damage response and dysfunction between cardiac and skeletal muscle. However, assessment of the effect of treatment on skeletal muscle in patients has been limited to muscle strength. METHODS: Early stage breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy including anthracyclines or trastuzumab enrolled into a RCT of a multi-disciplinary team intervention versus usual care. Patients underwent a MRI scan before the first and after the third chemotherapy treatment. A maximal incremental single leg plantar flexion test was performed followed by 15 min of rest. A 4-min steady state test was then performed at 60% of peak power. Beginning at end-exercise, time-resolved blood flow (popliteal vein, phase contrast MRI) and venous oxygen saturation (SvO2, susceptometry-based oximetry using deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent) were measured with custom methods. These values were used to calculate lower leg VO2 using the Fick equation with [hemoglobin] (hb) extracted from clinical records and SaO2 measured via pulse oximetry. RESULTS: Twelve patients have completed both scans. Preliminary analyses were of change over time with both groups combined. Peak power did not change (15.7 ± 3.0 to 16.6 ± 3.8 W, p=0.227). After treatment, oxygen carrying capacity of the blood (hb*1.34*SaO2) was significantly decreased (median change = -17%, p=0.004) due to reduced hemoglobin (13.5 ± 13 to 11.2 ± 13 g/dL). Exercise blood flow increased (438 ± 119 to 633 ± 167 mL/min, median change=44%; p<0.001) out of proportion to this reduction. SaO2 and SvO2 did not change appreciably (~98% and 60%, respectively). As a result there was a small but non-significant increase in leg VO2 (30 ± 9 to 35 ± 13 mL/min, median change = 16%, p=0.165). Exercise mean arterial pressure decreased and heart rate increased after treatment (p=0.007, p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary findings indicate that chemotherapy for breast cancer does not reduce oxygen extraction with isolated muscle exercise. Local blood flow increases partly in response to reduced oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood, but mechanisms for the remaining hyperemia response are unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→