Survey on the theoretical research and engineering applications of multivariate statistics process monitoring algorithms: 2008–2017
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multivariate statistical process monitoring (MSPM) methods are significant for improving production efficiency and enhancing safety. However, to the authors’ best knowledge, there is no survey paper providing statistics of published papers over the past decade. In this paper, several issues related to MSPM methods are reviewed and studied. First, the annual publication numbers of journal articles concerning MSPM are provided to show the active development of this important research field and to point out several promising directions in the future. Second, the annual numbers of patents are also shown to demonstrate the practicality of different MSPM methods. Particularly, this paper also lists and analyzes the number of MSPM‐related publications in China. The statistics indicate that Chinese researchers and engineers may have different viewpoints from those of other countries, which results in different development trends of MSPM in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it