Globalization: In Terms of Teachers' Opinion and Metaphorical Perceptions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate teachers' opinion and metaphorical perceptions about globalization. In thispaper, phenomenology one of the qualitative research type was used. 61 teachers’ metaphorical perceptions aboutglobalization were collected and interviewed with 12 teachers about globalization in education. Teachers’metaphorical perceptions about globalization were determined by a space filled question (globalization is similar to...;because ...). A semi-structured interview form has been prepared by the researchers. The opinions of the teachers canbe summarized as teachers associate globalization with technology, especially with the internet. In general teachersmentioned that the effects of globalization in education are positive. Further teachers’ metaphorical perceptionsabout globalization summarized as follows; village, market, whirlpool, family, shopping, teapot, neighborhood,technology. Withal teachers’ reasons for analogy of the metaphors about globalization are grouped as; globalizationas a unifying of differences concept, globalization as a communication and interaction enhancer concept,globalization as a damaging concept and globalization as an indefinite concept.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it