MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2806254416 · doi:10.14288/1.0357480

Modelling sediment dynamics at the basin scale : implications of changes in climate and hydrological regimes

2019· article· en· W2806254416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kai Tsuruta

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)SedimentEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Structural basinClimate changeGeologyClimatologyOceanographyGeomorphologyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basin-wide sediment dynamics are closely linked to hydrological processes and landscape and therefore expected to be susceptible to climate change. Simulating sediment transport through large basins presents a challenging problem to modellers; the relationship between water flux and sediment load is complex and non-linear, and significant sediment generation can occur over small spatial and time scales. To date, most studies have employed lumped empirical models that predict annual load at the outlet of a study basin, but do not consider variability across the basin or sub-annually. In this study, we adapt a physically-based, distributed suspended sediment transport model for large-scale use. The sediment model is integrated into the Terrestrial Hydrology Model with Biochemistry (THMB) as a routine to make use of THMB’s dynamic water routing. The coupled model is applied to the 230,000 km² Fraser River Basin (FRB) in British Columbia, Canada using 1) historical hydrological input to test the model and 2) synthetic input derived from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios A1B, A2, and B1 to study potential impacts of climate change. In both cases the input data is provided by the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (PCIC) and comes from simulations using the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model. Simulation results using historical inputs are compared with observations at five stations using the coefficient of determination (R²), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBIAS) metrics. Overall, simulated load values match well with observed values, with the monthly simulations at the station nearest the outlet scoring R² = 0.78, NSE = 0.77, and PBIAS = -20%. Simulation results using climate scenario-driven inputs are studied for potential future changes in sediment dynamics. Results re- veal a general shift in hillslope erosion and sediment yield towards larger values from autumn to spring, reduced summer values, and an overall annual increase, with hillslope generation growing 35-45% from baseline levels and yield at the basin’s outlet increasing 10-15%. These physically-based results offer unique insights into the impacts of climate change on sediment processes within a large basin and their potential implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→