Electron collection and thermionic emission from a spherical dust grain in the space-charge limited regime
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The collection and emission of electrons from a spherical body in the Space-Charge Limited (SCL) regime are investigated. When a Virtual Cathode (VC) in the potential profile around the body is present, the barrier in the effective potential energy of electrons is assumed to be located near the position of the minimum of the VC potential, for both collected and emitted electrons. This assumption is confirmed to be reasonable in the case of a double Yukawa potential profile and allows the SCL cross-section for electron collection and the emitted electron’s trapped-passing boundary to be written in a simple way. An expression for the collection current for Maxwellian electrons is derived and is shown to recover the classical Orbital Motion Limited (OML) theory when the VC vanishes. Using the same assumptions, an expression for the thermionic emission current in the SCL regime is also obtained and comparisons with the OML+ theory are made. Finally, an expression for the dust electric charge in the SCL regime is derived and shown to give drastically different results when compared to the commonly used formula (obtained from a Yukawa potential profile). Consequences in the framework of dust in tokamak plasmas are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".