MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2806293294 · doi:10.1101/335018

Whole genome linkage disequilibrium and effective population size in a coho salmon ( <i>Oncorhynchus kisutch</i> ) breeding population

2018· preprint· en· W2806293294 on OpenAlexafffund
Agustin Barría, Kris A. Christensen, Grazyella Yoshida, Ana Jedlicki, Jean P. Lhorente, W. Sean Davidson, José M. Yáñez

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersFondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaGenome CanadaUniversidad de ChileMinisterio de Economía, Fomento y Turismo, ChileGenome British ColumbiaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsLinkage disequilibriumBiologyGeneticsPopulationDisequilibriumOncorhynchusEffective population sizeSingle-nucleotide polymorphismAssociation mappingGenetic associationEvolutionary biologyGenetic variationGeneFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>GenotypeDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The estimation of linkage disequilibrium between molecular markers within a population is critical when establishing the minimum number of markers required for association studies, genomic selection and for inferring historical events influencing different populations. This work aimed to evaluate the extent and decay of linkage disequilibrium in a coho salmon breeding population using ddRAD genomic markers. Linkage disequilibrium was estimated between a total of 7,505 SNPs found in 62 individuals (33 dams and 29 sires) from the breeding population. The makers encompass all 30 coho salmon chromosomes and comprise 1,655.19 Mb of the genome. The average density of markers per chromosome ranged from 3.45 to 6.11 per 1 Mbp. The minor allele frequency averaged 0.20 (with a range from 0.08 to 0.50). The overall average linkage disequilibrium among SNPs pairs measured as r 2 was 0.054. The Average r 2 value decreased with increasing physical distance, with values ranging from 0.37 to 0.054 at distances lower than 1 kb and up to 10 Mb, respectively. An r 2 threshold of 0.1 was reached at distance of approximately 1.3 Mb. Chromosomes Okis05, Okis15 and Okis28 showed high levels of linkage disequilibrium (> 0.20 at distances lower than 1 Mb). Average r 2 values were lower than 0.1 for all chromosomes at distances greater than 4 Mb. Linkage disequilibrium values suggest that whole genome association and selection studies could be performed using about 75,000 SNPs in aquaculture populations (depending on the trait under investigation). From the identified SNPs, an effective population size of 100 was estimated for the population 10 generation ago, and 1,000, for 139 generations ago. Based on the extent of r 2 decay, we suggest that at least 75,000 SNPs would be necessary for an association mapping study. Over 100,000 SNPs would be necessary for a high power study, in the current coho salmon population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→