MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2806326643 · doi:10.1086/ahr.113.5.1514

:Citizen Docker: Making a New Deal on the Vancouver Waterfront, 1919–1939.<i>(Canadian Social History Series.)</i>

2008· article· en· W2806326643 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric W. Sager

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasualCapitalismWelfareWelfare capitalismLabor historyTrade unionLabor relationsWorking classInterwar periodGeneral strikeEconomic historyWelfare stateEconomyLawSociologyHistoryPolitical scienceWorld War IIEconomicsLabour economicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrew Parnaby has written a local history of large events and big issues. The local history is about dockworkers and employers in Vancouver as the city grew and became Canada's major western port. The casual labor markets prior to the 1920s were characterized by frequent strikes and the union-crushing tactics of employers determined to protect their investments in new dockside technologies. Following the labor revolt of 1919, employers set about to decasualize the labor force and to stabilize class relations through a dockside version of welfare capitalism. A fragile stability disappeared in the Depression, and the waterfront strike of 1935 was the largest strike to have occurred in British Columbia since 1919. That strike ended in the destruction of another waterfront union, and the Shipping Federation set about to restore its fragile accommodation with defeated workers. Parts of this local story have been told before, but no historian has painted these events onto so large a canvas. This book is about gender, Aboriginal workers, class relations, and the changing expectations of labor in the interwar period. It takes the study of welfare capitalism beyond the manufacturing sector, where it has been studied before in Canada, to the world of the stevedores, white and aboriginal, with their work gangs, hiring halls, and customary practices. Decasualization, Parnaby argues, was part of welfare capitalism, the employers' answer to the related problems of rootless single men, foreign-born radicals, and high labor turnover. The modest promise of welfare schemes began to attract a new type of dockworker, the stable married man living in South Vancouver, owning a house and perhaps a car. By the 1930s about seventy percent of the waterfront work force consisted of married men. Inherent in the accommodation with these new workers was the promise of a new citizenship, the reward for the sacrifices of the Great War. For the steady male breadwinner with his suburban home, citizenship came to mean a pension, medical benefits, and a “square deal.” Parnaby concludes that a “cultural transformation” (p. 173) changed workers' expectations and underwrote Fordism and the welfare state as these emerged during and after World War II.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0300.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical Review→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→