A new theory of the solid-state growth of embryos during nucleation: the fundamental role of interfacial mobility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the major challenges in nucleation theory is to explain the kinetic pathway allowing multicomponent precipitates to grow until they reach stability. This problem is particularly challenging when the supersaturation is low, so that the critical size of nucleation is large and requires the condensation of thousands of atoms. A new theory is proposed to explain the growth of embryos before they reach the critical size of nucleation. This theory is not a substitute of the classical nucleation theory, but a complement aiming to understand the kinetic pathway allowing unstable embryos to grow at the expense of their neighbours. The theory stands on the strong interactions between embryos. The latter may exchange atoms via impingement and coarsening, which are possible when there are no concentration gradients between the embryos. This condition is supposed to be met during the unstable growth regime of nucleation considering that the growth is limited by the interface during that period. Assuming that the embryos behave in a collective manner when they are grouped in a cloud, we show that the growth velocity of the most active embryos will be limited only by their interfacial mobility and the available driving force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it