MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806455883 · doi:10.1080/23802014.2018.1478238

Militarised cultures, disgraced bodies, and autocratic securities

2018· article· en· W2806455883 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jihan Zakarriya

Bibliographic record

VenueThird World Thematics A TWQ Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Security, and Conflict
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutocracyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the complex relationship between the concepts of female sexuality, security state, and militarised cultures and spaces as reflected in the cases of three women who are subjected to sexual violence and/or rape during the 2011 revolutions in Egypt and Libya. The three women are Egyptian Samira Ibrahim, who goes through humiliating virginity tests by army forces while in detention, South African Lara Logan, a CBS correspondent who is gang-raped in Tahrir Square in 2011, and Libyan Eman al-Obeidi, who is gang-raped by security forces during the 2011 Libyan revolution. Ibrahim, al-Obeidi, and Logan exceptionally and courageously speak about their sexual abuse at varying degrees of risk. While Ibrahim sues the Egyptian army for ‘virginity tests’, al-Obeidi escapes Libya to stay as a refugee in Canada. Logan’s case brings up controversial opinions of women as endangering their safety by working in dangerous professions like (war) journalism. This article argues that sexual violence against Ibrahim, al-Obeidi, and Logan is part of a dominant security state concept in Egypt and Libya that militarises and politicises public spaces, legalising state violence and individual vulnerability. Yet, women’s participation in protest spaces deconstructs these hegemonic practices of security oppression in Egypt and Libya.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.064
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThird World Thematics A TWQ JournalSame topicGender, Security, and ConflictFrench-language works237,207