MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806498845 · doi:10.4171/jems/1053

Counting walks with large steps in an orthant

2021· preprint· en· W2806498845 on OpenAlex
Alin Bostan, Mireille Bousquet‐Mélou, Stephen Melczer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Mathematical Society · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WaterlooAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsOrthantEnumerationGroup (periodic table)Invariant (physics)Generating functionPolynomialLattice (music)Finite setQuadrant (abdomen)CombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past fifteen years, the enumeration of lattice walks with steps taken in a prescribed set \mathcal S and confined to a given cone, especially the first quadrant of the plane, has been intensely studied. As a result, the generating functions of quadrant walks are now well-understood, provided the allowed steps are small , that is \mathcal S \subset \{-1, 0,1\}^2 . In particular, having small steps is crucial for the definition of a certain group of bi-rational transformations of the plane. It has been proved that this group is finite if and only if the corresponding generating function is D-finite (that is, it satisfies a linear differential equation with polynomial coefficients). This group is also the key to the uniform solution of 19 of the 23 small step models possessing a finite group. In contrast, almost nothing is known for walks with arbitrary steps. In this paper, we extend the definition of the group, or rather of the associated orbit, to this general case, and generalize the above uniform solution of small step models. When this approach works, it invariably yields a D-finite generating function. We apply it to many quadrant problems, including some infinite families. After developing the general theory, we consider the 13110 two-dimensional models with steps in \{-2,-1,0,1\}^2 having at least one -2 coordinate. We prove that only 240 of them have a finite orbit, and solve 231 of them with our method. The nine remaining models are the counterparts of the four models of the small step case that resist the uniform solution method (and which are known to have an algebraic generating function). We conjecture D-finiteness for their generating functions, but only two of them are likely to be algebraic. We also prove non-D-finiteness for the 12870 models with an infinite orbit, except for 16 of them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it