MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806666137 · doi:10.22215/timreview/1157

What Do Business Customers Value? An Empirical Study of Value Propositions in a Servitization Context

2018· article· en· W2806666137 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Kwesi Sakyi-Gyinae, Maria Holmlund

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology Innovation Management Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicService and Product Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFedDev Ontario
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Value (mathematics)BusinessValue propositionBusiness valueEmpirical researchBusiness administrationMarketingEconomicsMicroeconomicsMathematicsStatisticsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionModern-day manufacturers expand their product lines via implementation, maintenance, upgrades, and a lifecycle approach, offering not just a product or equipment, but an outcome. New technologies, such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices, sensors, and big data are making it easier for manufacturers to monitor, analyze, and manage their products on the market, thus

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.026
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology Innovation Management ReviewSame topicService and Product InnovationFrench-language works237,207