MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2806881550 · doi:10.7227/lh.23.1.5

Reviews: Fictions of Conversion: Jews, Christians, and Cultures of Change in Early Modern England, Shakespeare and the Remains of Richard III, Shakespeare and the Law: A Conversation among Disciplines and Professions, the Accommodated Animal: Cosmopolity in Shakespearean Locales, the Romantic Crowd: Sympathy, Controversy and Print Culture, Romantic Readers and Transatlantic Travel: Expeditions and Tours in North America, 1760–1840, in the Shadow of the Gallows: Race, Crime, and American Civic Identity, Unusual Suspects: Pitt's Reign of Alarm and the Lost Generation of the 1790s, Romanticism and Childhood: The Infantilization of British Literary Culture, Reading Victorian Deafness: Signs and Sounds in Victorian Literature and Culture, Economic Woman: Demand, Gender, and Narrative Closure in Eliot and Hardy, We Modern People: Science Fiction and the Making of Russian Modernity, Dying for Time: Proust, Woolf and Nabokov, Transatlantic Avant-Gardes: Little Magazines and Localist Modernism, Regional Modernisms, the New Death: American Modernism and World War I, Samuel Roth, Infamous Modernist, the Love-Charm of Bombs: Restless Lives in the Second World War, Unbecoming Americans: Writing Race and Nation from the Shadows of Citizenship, 1945–1960, London Irish Fictions: Narrative, Diaspora and Identity

2014· article· en· W2806881550 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver Wort, Ian Frederick Moulton, R. C. Richardson, Edward J. Geisweidt, Sharon Ruston, Peter Newbon, Jennifer Greiman, Mary Fairclough, Richard De Ritter, R. J. Sweet, Samantha Briggs, Matthew Taunton, Adam Watt, John Timberman Newcomb, Stephanie Boland, Ariela Freedman, David Brauner, Natasha Periyan, Daniel Grausam, Tomos Owen

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterature & History · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoviet and Russian History
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationSociologyClassicsLawHistoryLiteratureArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLiterature & HistorySame topicSoviet and Russian HistoryFrench-language works237,207