Interaction Model for “Shelled Particles” and Small-Strain Modulus of Granular Materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The elastic modulus of a granular assembly composed of spherical particles in Hertzian contact usually has a scaling law with the mean effective pressure p as K∼G∼p1/3. Laboratory test results, however, reveal that the value of the exponent is generally around 1/2 for most sands and gravels, but it is much higher for reclaimed asphalt concrete composed of particles coated by a thin layer of asphalt binder and even approaching unity for aggregates consisting of crushed stone. By assuming that a particle is coated with a thin soft deteriorated layer, an energy-based simple approach is proposed for thin-coating contact problems. Based on the features of the surface layer, the normal contact stiffness between two spheres varies with the contact force following kn∼Fnm and m∈[1/3, 1], with m=1/3 for Hertzian contact, m=1/2 soft thin-coating contact, m=2/3 for incompressible soft thin-coating, and m=1 for spheres with rough surfaces. Correspondingly, the elastic modulus of a random granular packing is proportional to pm with m∈[1/3, 1].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it