Stiffness– and damping–strain curves of sensitive Champlain clays through experimental and analytical approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stiffness degradation, G/G 0 , curves of Champlain clay at St-Adelphe, Quebec, and the associated variation of its damping ratio with shear strain are constructed in this study using the new combined triaxial simple shear (T x SS) apparatus. The apparatus offers the ability to obtain the stiffness (G/G 0 ) and damping ratio of soils over a wide strain spectrum from 0.001% to 10%. The value of the small-strain stiffness of the tested clay is further confirmed through another series of piezoelectric ring-actuator technique (P-RAT) tests. Although, the stiffness degradation curve of the tested clay follows to some extent traditional curves suggested in the literature, the examined Champlain clay exhibits a different trend with respect to hysteresis damping, especially at large strains (>1%), and available analytical models could not successfully predict the damping behavior of the Champlain clay at such a strain level. A new constitutive model is therefore presented as a modification of the original Sig4 model considering the pore-water pressure built up with shear strain. Stiffness degradation and damping ratio versus shear strain curves of Champlain clays estimated using the proposed soil model are similar to their experimentally determined counterparts even at large shear strains where other models tend to misjudge the damping behavior of the clay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".