Calculation of some electromagnetic quantities for circular thick coil of rectangular cross‐section and pancake with inverse radial currents
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, the new expressions for the mutual inductance and the magnetic force between two Bitter coils (thick coil and pancake) with the inverse radial current densities are presented. These types of coils are used for producing the high magnetic fields. For producing strong magnetic fields, the coils are extremely heated, so that they could be cooled to avoid this problem. During a water‐cooled magnet trip, the induced current in coil changes as a function of decay time constant which is determined by the self‐inductance and the resistance of the water‐cooled magnet. Moreover, such high fields develop the strong magnetic forces which can cause the mechanical stress upon the supporting structure. This way the precise evaluation of these electrical quantities between coils must be calculated to optimise the support structure of Bitter coils. With the newly presented approach, these quantities are obtained in an analytical and semi‐analytical form expressed over elliptical integrals and simple integrals. For validating this method, the comparative improved filament method is used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it