Computer-aided Discovery of Peptides that Specifically Attack Bacterial Biofilms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Biofilms represent a multicellular growth state of bacteria that are intrinsically resistant to conventional antibiotics. It was recently shown that a synthetic immunomodulatory cationic peptide, 1018 (VRLIVAVRIWRR-NH 2 ), exhibits broad-spectrum antibiofilm activity but the sequence determinants of antibiofilm peptides have not been systematically studied. In the present work, a peptide library consisting of 96 single amino acid substituted variants of 1018 was SPOT-synthesized on cellulose arrays and evaluated against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms. This dataset was used to establish quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models relating the antibiofilm activity of these peptides to hundreds of molecular descriptors derived from their sequences. The developed 3D QSAR models then predicted the probability that a peptide would possess antibiofilm activity from a library of 100,000 virtual peptide sequences in silico . A subset of these variants were SPOT-synthesized and their activity assessed, revealing that the QSAR models resulted in ~85% prediction accuracy. Notably, peptide 3002 (ILVRWIRWRIQW-NH 2 ) was identified that exhibited an 8-fold increased antibiofilm potency in vitro compared to 1018 and proved effective in vivo , significantly reducing abscess size in a chronic MRSA mouse infection model. This study demonstrates that QSAR modeling can successfully be used to identify antibiofilm specific peptides with therapeutic potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".