Sodium intake but not renal nerves attenuates renal venous pressure-induced changes in renal hemodynamics in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased central venous pressure and renal venous pressure (RVP) are associated with worsening of renal function in acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure. We tested whether an acute isolated elevation of RVP in one kidney leads to ipsilateral renal vasoconstriction and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and whether this depends on dietary salt intake or activation of renal nerves. Male Lewis rats received a normal (1% NaCl, NS) or high-salt (6% NaCl) diet for ≥14 days before the acute experiment. Rats were then randomized into the following three groups: time control and RVP elevation to either 10 or 20 mmHg to assess heart rate, renal blood flow (RBF), and GFR. To increase RVP, the left renal vein was partially occluded for 120 min. To determine the role of renal nerves, surgical denervation was conducted in rats on both diets. Renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) was additionally recorded in a separate group of rats. Increasing RVP to 20 mmHg decreased ipsilateral RBF (7.5 ± 0.4 to 4.1 ± 0.7 ml/min, P < 0.001), renal vascular conductance (0.082 ± 0.006 to 0.060 ± 0.011 ml·min −1 ·mmHg −1 , P < 0.05), and GFR (1.28 ± 0.08 to 0.40 ± 0.13 ml/min, P < 0.05) in NS rats. The reduction was abolished by high-salt diet but not by renal denervation. Furthermore, a major increase of RVP (1.6 ± 0.8 to 24.7 ± 1.2 mmHg) immediately suppressed RSNA and decreased heart rate ( P < 0.05), which points to suppression of both local and systemic sympathetic activity. Taken together, acute elevated RVP induces renal vasoconstriction and decreased GFR, which is more likely to be mediated via the renin-angiotensin system than via renal nerves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".