Effects of CO<sub>2</sub> water-bath treatment on blood flow and angiogenesis in ischemic hind limb of diabetic rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of CO 2 water-bath therapy on the hind limb of diabetic animals with or without peripheral ischemia were examined. Diabetes was induced in rats by administering streptozotocin (65 mg·kg −1 ), and the animals were then divided into 3 groups. After 4 weeks, peripheral ischemia was induced by ligation of the femoral artery for 2 weeks in 2 groups (diabetic ischemic) of diabetic rats, whereas the femoral artery was not occluded in the third group (diabetic). All these animals were subjected to water-bath therapy (with or without CO 2 mixing; 20 min·day −1 for 5 days·week −1 ) for a period of 4 weeks. Both peak and mean flows, unlike minimal flow, in diabetic ischemic limbs were increased about a twofold by CO 2 water-bath treatment. Morphological examination of hind limb tissue sections revealed about a twofold increase in the small artery count in diabetic ischemic animals upon CO 2 water-bath treatment. These results indicate that CO 2 water-bath therapy augments the blood flow and development of angiogenesis in the skeletal muscle of diabetic ischemic animals and thus may be of some benefit for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease in diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".