Studies on thickened tailings deposition in flume tests using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of laboratory flume tests on thickened tailings were conducted to highlight the factors that may influence the slopes of final profiles achieved in such flumes. The numerical model was first validated against the analytical solution of a sheet of Bingham fluid on a flat plane at flow stoppage. It was then used to investigate the influence of several factors on the average slopes of the final profiles. The results show that an increase of volume, energy, flume width or base angle reduces the resulting slope angle. Moreover, the yield stress of the fluid generally has more influence on the final profiles than the viscosity. In addition, the viscosity tends to have less influence on the formation of the final profiles if the inertial effects are relatively weak. Finally, two dimensionless parameters are proposed to establish the relationship between the average slope, rheological properties, and geometrical parameters for planar deposition of thickened tailings in both sudden-release (S-R) and discharge flume tests. These results provide a better understanding of the deposition of thickened tailings in the field. The agreement between simulation results and laboratory observations in the literature gives confidence in the veracity of the computational results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".