MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807428798 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v52i1.1763

Clinical pharmacy services in a pediatric hematology/oncology clinic: A description and assessment

2018· article· en· W2807428798 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tracey Taylor, L. Lee Dupuis, Darcy Nicksy, Cindy Girvan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionClinical pharmacyPharmacistPharmacyFamily medicineAmbulatoryPediatric oncologyInternal medicinePediatricsNursingCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives: To characterize the drug-related needs of ambulatory HO patients identified by a pharmacist; describe the role of the pharmacist in a pediatric hematology/oncology (HO) clinic; assess the impact of clinical pharmacy services in a pediatric HO clinic on patient care; and make recommendations for the future provision of clinical pharmacy services to patients attending the HO clinic. Design: Prospective descriptive study over 12 weeks. Setting: Hematology/oncology clinic in a 411 bed tertiary/quarternary, university-affiliated pediatric hospital. Patients: Thirty-one children who attended a clinic post-bone marrow transplant (BMT) and 27 children who attended an oncology clinic. Methods: Actual or potential drug-related problems (DRPs) were identified or verified by patient/parent dialogue and interventions were made by the pharmacist in consultation with the responsible physician and/or patient/parent. The impact of a subset of these interventions was assessed by two physicians and two pharmacists. Results: 165 DRPs were identified in 31 BMT and 27 ONC patients. The mean number of DRPs identified per patient was 4.8 in BMT patients and 0.6 in ONC patients. The most frequently identified DRP was too high a (35%) in BMT patients and ''inappropriate medication administration (35%) in ONC patients. 177 interventions were made by the pharmacist; 81 % were accepted by the physician and/or patient/parent. The review panel deemed 83.5% of the subset of interventions to have had a positive impact. Conclusions: Children attending the HO clinic have drug-related needs. BMT patients would benefit from dialogue with a pharmacist for assessment, prevention, and resolution of their DRPs while the primary need for newly diagnosed ONC patients is education regarding antineoplastic and supportive therapy. RESUME Objectifs : Determiner les besoins pharmacotherapeutiques des patients ambulatoires en HO (hematologie/oncologie) qu'a identifies le pharmacien; decrier le role du pharmacien au sein d'une clinique d'hematologie/oncologie pour enfants; evaluer l'impact des services de pharmacie clinique dans une clinique d'HO pour enfants sur les soins apportes aux patients; et formuler des recommandations pour la planification de la fourniture des services de pharmacie clinique aux patients qui frequent une clinique d'HO. Plan : etude prospective de prevalence d'une duree de 12 semaines. Milieu : clinique d'hematologie/oncologie dans un hopital pour enfants affilie a une universite, de 411 lits de soins tertiaires/quaternaires. Patients : Trente et un enfants qui ont frequente une clinique apres une greffe de moelle osseuse (GMO) et 27 autres enfants qui ont frequente une clinique d'oncologie (CO). Methodes : Les problemes pharmacotherapeutiques (PP) reels ou potentiels ont ete identifies ou verifies au moyen d'une discussion avec le patient/parent et des interventions ont ete portees par le pharmacien apres consultation avec le medecin traitant et/ou le patient/parent. L’impact d'un sous-groupe de ces interventions a ete evalue par deux medecins et deux pharmaciens. Resultats : 165 PP ont ete identifies chez 31 patients GMO et 27 patients CO. Le nombre moyen de PP identifies par patient etait de 4,8 chez les patients GMO et de 0,6 chez les patients CO. Le PP qui a ete le plus souvent identifie etait «une dose trop elevee» (35 %) chez les patients GMO et «l'administration d'un medicament inadequat» (35 %) chez les patients CO. Un total de 177 interventions ont ete realisees par le pharmacien et 81 % de ces dernieres ont ete acceptees par le medecin et/ou le patient/parent. Le comite de revision a juge que 83,5 % du sous-groupe d'interventions avait eu un impact positif. Conclusions : Les enfants qui frequentent une clinique d'HO ont des besoins pharmacotherapeutiques. Les patients GMO tireraient profit d'une discussion avec le pharmacien pour evaluer, prevenir et resoudre leurs PP, alors que les patients CO qui viennent d'etre diagnostiques ont d'abord un besoin d'education en ce qui a trait aux traitements antineoplasiques et de soutien.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.475
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207