MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Physical Activity Counselling and Exercise Prescription Practices of Physiotherapists in Nova Scotia

2018· article· en· W2807430613 on OpenAlexaffabout
Myles W. O’Brien, Chris Shields, Kristin L. Campbell, B. Doyle, Sandra Crowell, Patrick J. McGrath, Jonathon R. Fowles

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaNova Scotia Health AuthorityAcadia UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFacilitatorPhysical therapyPopulationNova scotiaMedical prescriptionFamily medicineScope of practiceIntervention (counseling)Exercise prescriptionNursingHealth carePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Physiotherapists (PTs) have education and scope of practice to promote the benefits of physical activity (PA) and prescribe exercise in their clinical interactions with patients. As such, they provide an avenue to increase the reach of Exercise is Medicine, to improve the PA levels of the Canadian population. However, no study has assessed Canadian physiotherapists’ perceptions and practices surrounding physical activity counselling and exercise prescription (PAE). METHODS: PTs working in Nova Scotia (n=146) completed an online self-reflection survey regarding their current practices, confidence, barriers, and facilitators in providing PAE to their patients. RESULTS: Overall confidence for PAE was high (most scores >80%) except for in helping patients maintain PA (72.8±25%) and in patients following through on PAE recommendations (66.3±22.5%). PTs include PAE in 85±23% of appointments and prescribe written exercise in 80±20% of appointments, but only refer to other exercise professionals or facilities in 27±27% of appointments. The most salient barriers to providing PAE were patient’s interest in PA, and patients’ preference for medication management over lifeestyle intervention (2.36±0.68 and 2.11±0.66 respectively, out of 4), exceeding the typically cited barrier of lack of provider time. The most helpful facilitator was PTs’ perceived patients’ readiness to do PAE (3.5±0.7, out of 4). PTs are most comfortable providing PAE advice to those with arthritis and musculoskeletal issues (81%) and least comfortable to those with cancer (49%), insulin requiring diabetes (33%), respiratory disease (32%) and mental health concerns (28%). CONCLUSION: The primary barriers for PTs in providing PAE are patient-focused and PTs may benefit from avenues that allow greater referral access to other exercise professionals and a collaborative treatment approach to help patients maintain a physically active lifestyle, especially in those with other chronic disease beyond musculo-skeletal disorders. Exercise is Medicine networks should consider greater collaborations between allied health and exercise professionals to support multi-disciplinary approaches to patient exercise management across the continuum of health care. Support provided by: Lawson Foundation, Nova Scotia Health Authority

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicPhysical Activity and Health→French-language works237,207→