MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex Differences in Diaphragmatic Fatigue

2018· article· en· W2807512977 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph F. Welch, Bruno Archiza, Jordan A. Guenette, Christopher R. West, A. William Sheel

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyBlood pressureDiaphragmatic breathingInternal medicineHeart ratePhotoplethysmogramHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspiratory muscle fatigue (IMF) is associated with a sympathetically mediated metaboreflex, resulting in time-dependent sympathoexcitation, including increased heart rate, mean arterial pressure and limb vascular resistance that impairs tolerance to exercise. Women may be more resistant to IMF relative to men and therefore, may experience an attenuated inspiratory muscle metaboreflex. PURPOSE: To examine sex-based differences in a) the cardiovascular response to inspiratory pressure-threshold loading (PTL) and b) the effect of prior-induced IMF on subsequent exercise performance. METHODS: Healthy men (n = 9) and women (n = 9) completed a maximal incremental cycle test on day 1. On day 2, subjects performed PTL to task failure followed by a constant load submaximal time-to-exhaustion (TTE) exercise test (85% peak work rate). On day 3, subjects performed the same exercise test without prior-induced IMF. Diaphragmatic fatigue was assessed by measuring transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure (Pdi,tw) in response to cervical magnetic stimulation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured beat-by-beat throughout PTL via photoplethysmography, and low-frequency systolic pressure (LFSBP, surrogate for sympathetic vasomotor tone) calculated from arterial waveforms using power spectrum analysis. RESULTS: At task failure of PTL, the severity of IMF was similar between sexes (W = 23 ± 6%, M = 24 ± 8% reduction in Pdi,tw, p = 0.33). However, time to task failure was significantly longer in women than men (27 ± 11 vs. 16 ± 11 min, p = 0.02) and consequently, women tended to produce greater cumulative diaphragmatic pressure (46,805 ± 16,723 vs. 32,288 ± 20,752 cmH O⋅s-1; p = 0.06). Furthermore, women exhibited less of an increase in HR (13 ± 8 vs. 19 ± 12 bpm, p = 0.01) and MAP (10 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 9 mmHg, p = 0.02) during PTL, and significantly lower LFSBP (27 ± 12 vs. 38 ± 7 mmHg2, p = 0.04) compared to men. Prior-induced IMF resulted in the premature termination of exercise that did not differ on the basis of sex (W = 15 ± 19%, M = 16 ± 19% decrease in TTE, p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Inspiratory muscle endurance time is significantly longer in women than men. Fatiguing contractions of the diaphragm elicit a blunted cardiovascular response in women, whilst IMF contributes to exercise impairment independent of sex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207