Folic acid supplementation does not attenuate thermoregulatory or cardiovascular strain of older adults exposed to extreme heat and humidity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Does folic acid supplementation alleviate thermoregulatory and cardiovascular strain of older adults during exposure to extreme heat and humidity? What is the main finding and its importance? Folic acid supplementation for 6 weeks did not affect whole‐limb blood flow/vasodilatation, core and skin temperatures, heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac output. Thus, 6 weeks of folic acid supplementation does not alleviate thermoregulatory or cardiovascular strain of healthy older adults exposed to extreme heat and humidity. Abstract Folic acid supplementation reverses age‐related reductions in cutaneous vasodilatation during passive heating. However, it is unknown if folic acid supplementation alleviates thermoregulatory and cardiovascular strain experienced by older adults during heat exposure. We evaluated the effect of folic acid supplementation on thermoregulatory and cardiovascular responses of nine healthy older adults (61–72 years, 3 males/6 females) exposed to extreme heat and humidity. Participants rested at 42°C while relative humidity was increased from 30% to 70% in 2% increments every 5 min. The protocol was performed before (CON) and after (FOLIC) 6 weeks of folic acid supplementation (5 mg day−1). Local cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC, laser‐Doppler flowmetry), forearm vascular conductance (FVC, Doppler ultrasound), mean skin and oesophageal temperatures, heart rate, blood pressure and cardiac output were measured. Folic acid supplementation increased fasting serum folate concentrations (P < 0.01). Absolute CVC was greater throughout the protocol following supplementation (CON: 1.29 ± 0.16 units mmHg−1 vs. FOLIC: 1.65 ± 0.24 units mmHg−1, P < 0.01). However, normalized CVC (CON: 54 ± 8% vs. FOLIC: 59 ± 7%, P = 0.22), FVC (CON: 3.47 ± 0.76 ml mmHg−1 vs. FOLIC: 3.40 ± 0.56 ml mmHg−1, P = 0.93), mean skin (P = 0.81) and oesophageal (CON: 36.87 ± 0.28°C vs. folic: 36.90 ± 0.25°C, P = 0.98) temperatures, heart rate (CON: 83 ± 10 beats min−1 vs. FOLIC: 84 ± 8 beats min−1, P = 0.64), blood pressure (P = 0.71) and cardiac output (P = 0.20) were unaffected by folic acid supplementation. These results demonstrate that 6 weeks of folic acid supplementation does not alleviate thermoregulatory or cardiovascular strain of healthy older adults exposed to extreme heat and humidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".