MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807589708 · doi:10.1093/ahr/123.3.950

Gregory Nobles. John James Audubon: The Nature of the American Woodsman.

2018· article· en· W2807589708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christoph Irmscher

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrnithologyArt historyGloryEnvironmental ethicsNaturalismArtHistoryClassicsPhilosophyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John James Audubon was the first American painter of truly international stature, despite the fact that he limited himself to birds and, at the end of his career, quadrupeds. He was also one of the most important American nature writers, producing over three thousand pages of ornithological essays, filled with close observations on bird behavior, which became one of the primary sources for Charles Darwin’s The Descent of Man (1871). Audubon’s conception of America, as Gregory Nobles points out, followed the routes the birds traveled; thus, it included Labrador as well as Louisiana, the state where Audubon would often (falsely) claim he was born. Perhaps ironically, biographers and even the handful of academic scholars who have written about Audubon have inevitably tried to fit him into narrowly nationalistic frameworks. From Francis Hobart Herrick’s still unsurpassed Audubon the Naturalist: A History of His Life and Time (1917) to the widely read popular biography John James Audubon: The Making of an American by Richard Rhodes (2004), Audubon time and again is made to rise from inauspicious, foreign beginnings (hampered as he was by his illegitimate birth and lack of formal training) to the glory of national scientific and entrepreneurial success. Nobles’s John James Audubon, beautifully produced by the University of Pennsylvania Press, is no exception. It delivers, competently and fluently, what its subtitle promises—an investigation of Audubon’s personal brand, the “American Woodsman.” Unlike other writers, Nobles is relatively unconcerned about Audubon’s mass killings of birds. “Audubon knew that proof lay in a pile of carcasses,” he states succinctly (165). As the emerging American scientific establishment, represented most prominently by George Ord and the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, tried to discredit him, Audubon, for whom a connection with ordinary American citizens mattered more than the approbation of his peers, sought recourse in his own version of rugged, gun-toting frontier masculinity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.598
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207