Measuring the orientation of a single CdSe/CdS nanocrystal at the end of a near-field tip for the realization of a versatile active SNOM probe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The orientation of a CdSe/CdS nanocrystal attached at the end of a scanning near field optical microscope (SNOM) tip is analyzed by its coupling with a flat gold layer. The Purcell factors for a set of distances to the gold surface are measured after a NC is caught by a SNOM tip. These measurements are compared with the modeling of the emission of a 2D dipole on a gold layer taking into account the layer of polymer serving as a glue for the NC. The 2D dipole is perpendicular to the c-axis of the NC, which is the growth axis. The behavior of the Purcell factor as a function of the distance to the gold layer depends on the angle made by this axis and the surface. The adjustment of the experimental results and the modelization gives the orientation of the NC at the end of the SNOM tip. Different orientations of the c-axis are determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".