MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807636872 · doi:10.1037/rep0000180

Psychological symptoms and perceived cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: The role of rumination.

2018· article· en· W2807636872 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Bailee L. Malivoire, Crystal Hare, Tae L. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueRehabilitation Psychology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersMultiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation
KeywordsRuminationAnxietyPsychologyClinical psychologyDepression (economics)CognitionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Perceived cognitive impairment is a common concern among individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and is associated with prevalent psychological symptoms, namely depression and anxiety. The mechanisms by which these psychological symptoms are associated with perceived cognitive impairment among people diagnosed with MS have been unexplored. A possible mechanism is rumination, a maladaptive form of self-reflection that is commonly associated with anxiety and depression. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations of symptoms of anxiety and depression with perceived cognitive impairment, and to examine whether anxiety and depression indirectly affect cognitive impairment through rumination. Research Method/Design: The study utilized a cross-sectional observational design. People diagnosed with MS (N = 111) were recruited from an MS clinic in Toronto, and through the community. Participants completed self-report questionnaires that included the Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire (MSNQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ). Two indirect effect statistical analyses were conducted using bootstrapping techniques. RESULTS: We found a positive association between both symptoms of depression and anxiety and perceived cognitive impairment. Moreover, psychological symptoms were related to perceived cognitive impairment indirectly through rumination, indicating ruminative thinking style may be implicated in the relationship between anxiety, depression, and perceived cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: These findings provide additional support for previous research examining the relationship between psychological symptoms (e.g., anxiety and depression) and perceived cognitive impairment, and enrich our understanding of a potential mechanism driving these relationships. (PsycINFO Database Record

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRehabilitation PsychologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207