MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PWE-036 A prospective audit of the 2017 espen guidelines on micronutrient testing in quiescent IBD patients

2018· article· en· W2807696060 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M MacMaster, Christina Thomson, Dinesh Talwar, Fiona Stefanowicz, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Daniel R. Gaya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Esophagitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicronutrientMedicineAuditProspective cohort studyIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePathologyBusinessAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction ESPEN guidelines advise regular screening for micronutrient deficiencies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This is rarely undertaken in UK and in the presence of active disease and systemic inflammation, plasma micronutrient concentration is complicated by the influence of acute phase response. We prospectively audited the micronutrient profile in an IBD cohort in clinical remission attending the OPC. Methods 54 IBD patients in remission were identified between September 2017 and January 2018 with a Harvey Bradshaw Index≤4 or partial Mayo score <2. Micronutrient screen was performed for Vitamin B1, B2, B6 and B12, Vitamin A, Vitamin E, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Vitamin K, Selenium, Magnesium, Copper, Ferritin, Zinc, Manganese and Folate. Serum albumin and CRP were measured and faecal calprotectin was also tested. Results 33 patients had Crohn’s disease with the majority Montreal A2 (15), L2 (15), B1 (23). 21 patients had UC or IBDU with majority Montreal A2 (12), E2 (10). Low levels of Vitamin B2 were identified in 1 (2%); Vitamin B6 in 10 (19%); Vitamin B12 in 6 (11%), Vitamin A in 1 (2%); Vitamin C in 9 (17%); Vitamin D in 39 (72%); Ferritin in 3 (6%); Zinc in 10 (20%) and Folate in 4 (8%). 3 (6%) patients had low levels of Selenium, Magnesium and Copper. Vitamin E, Vitamin B1 and Manganese were within normal range in all patients. To rule out the effect of acute phase response on blood micronutrient levels, a subgroup of 27 (50%) patients with albumin >34 g/L, CRP <20 mg/L and faecal calprotectin <250 mg/kg were analysed. Low levels of Vitamin B2 were identified in 1 (4%); Vitamin B6 in 4 (15%); Vitamin B12 in 2 (8%), Vitamin A in 1 (4%); Vitamin C in 2 (7%); Vitamin D in 20 (74%); Copper in 2 (7%); Ferritin in 1 (4%); Zinc in 4 (15%) and Folate in 2 (7%). Magnesium was within normal range in all patients. A few patients had high Vitamin B1 (1), Selenium (1) and Manganese (3). Spearman’ rank correlation analysis showed positive significant correlations between faecal calprotectin with Vitamin B2, Magnesium, Copper, Ferritin and manganese; CRP with serum Selenium and Copper; and Albumin with Vitamin B2, Vitamin A, Vitamin D, serum Selenium, Copper, Ferritin and Zinc. Conclusions While we identified a substantial number of IBD patients with micronutrient deficiencies, a proportion of these may be an epiphenomenon of the acute phase response. We propose that micronutrient screening only be performed in IBD patients with disease in ‘deep’ remission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEosinophilic EsophagitisFrench-language works237,207