MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2807879855 · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00878

Reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to Chemicals and Fuels: A Solution to Global Warming and Energy Crisis

2018· article· en· W2807879855 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sebastian C. Peter

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Energy Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada's Oil Sands Innovation AllianceDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific ResearchU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsCitationGlobal warmingEnergy (signal processing)Environmental researchComputer scienceLibrary scienceEnvironmental scienceClimate changeStatisticsMathematicsEnvironmental resource management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVEnergy FocusNEXTReduction of CO2 to Chemicals and Fuels: A Solution to Global Warming and Energy CrisisSebastian C. Peter*Sebastian C. PeterNew Chemistry Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, Bangalore 560064, IndiaSchool of Advanced Materials, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore 560064, IndiaMore by Sebastian C. Peterhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5211-446XCite this: ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 7, 1557–1561Publication Date (Web):June 13, 2018Publication History Received28 May 2018Accepted1 June 2018Published online13 June 2018Published inissue 13 July 2018https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00878https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00878article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views27915Altmetric-Citations396LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (2 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Alcohols,Coal,Energy,Manufacturing,Power Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1570.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations652
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Energy LettersSame topicCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsFrench-language works237,207