MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808055136

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF A REFRIGERATOR BY USING ALTERNATIVE ECO FRIENDLY REFRIGERANTS( R600a & HC MIXTURE).

2017· article· en· W2808055136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nulaka Rajeswari, B. Omprakash

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantRefrigerationRefrigerator carEnvironmentally friendlyEnvironmental scienceHeat exchangerGlobal-warming potentialAtmosphere (unit)ThermodynamicsGeologyGreenhouse gasPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present days refrigeration became a common human need but due to the release of green house gases from the refrigerators in to the earth’s atmosphere, causes high global warming and in turn destructing the ozone layer of atmosphere. In concern of the earth’s environment, Montreal and Kyoto protocols proposed for alternative eco-friendly refrigerants. In the current work, experimental investigation on VCRS system tested with R600a and hydrocarbon mixture (R290/R600a) as refrigerants as they have zero ODP and very low GWP related to the refrigerant R134a. Due to the higher value of latent heat of hydrocarbons, the amount of refrigerant charge will be relatively lower than R134a. By using R600a and hydrocarbon mixture refrigerants of charges 50g, 55g and 60 g are tested individually for performance characteristics and critical correlations are drawn between the refrigerants and represented by graphical representation. Refrigeration effect of R290/R600a (50/50 by wt %) mixture was 21.4% higher than R600a for 55g charge. The obtained results proved that the overall performance of 55g (R290/R600a) mixture could be considered as the best eco-friendly alternative refrigerant phase out R134a refrigerant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative ResearchSame topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207