The Role of Teachers in Establishing an Attractive Environment to Develop the Creative Thinking among Basic Stage Students in the Schools of Tafilah Governorate According to their own Perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to identify the role of teachers in founding an attractive environment for developingthe creative thinking, among the students of the basic stage in the schools of Tafilah Governorate. The researcherapplied the descriptive statistical method, and developed a questionnaire consisting of (45) items, divided into fiveDimensions: "Teaching strategies, Material preparations, extracurricular activities, Personality traits and Evaluationstrategies ". The instrument stability and validity were validated and approved. The sample of the study consisted of(300) female and male teachers, who were selected through a simple random method. The study resulted of the arethe following:- The estimate of the sample members of the instrument as a whole was moderate, and the fourth Dimension"personal traits" ranked first, with a moderate estimation, while the second was "material preparations" which camein the last rank, and with a low grade of estimation.- There were statistically significant differences in the sample of the study teachers' same role, attributed to thevariables of "gender and academic qualification", while there were no statistically significant differences in thesample of the study for their role attributed to the variable of "years of experience".Based on the results of the study, the researcher presented recommendations, including reviewing the programs ofpreparing and training teachers, the need to include plans and strategies for the development of creative thinking, andenrichment of the school curriculum for the basic stage programs to develop the creative thinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it