MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808218397

Quantitative genetics of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) wood quality traits in Sweden

2018· dissertation· en· W2808218397 on OpenAlex
Haleh Hayatgheibi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEpsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPinus contortaHeritabilityDiameter at breast heightBiologyTree breedingHorticultureBotanyWoody plantEvolutionary biology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stem bending, breakage, and general instability of lodgepole pine has been a major problem in northern Sweden due to low stem stiffness. The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate the potential incorporation of wood quality traits into lodgepole pine advanced breeding programs. To achieve this, 823 increment cores were sampled from 207 half-sib families at two progeny trials of lodgepole pine and genetic variations in wood density, microfibril angle (MFA), modulus of elasticity (clearwood stiffness; MOEs), radial fibre width (RFW), tangential fibre width (TFW), fibre wall thickness (FWT), and fibre coarseness (FC) were characterised.
\nTo quantify genotype by environment interactions (G × E) for growth and stiffness and to evaluate performance of provenances, diameter at breast height (DBH) and dynamic stiffness of standing trees (MOEtof) were studied, using six 33-36 year-old lodgepole progeny trials within three different breeding zones in northern Sweden. To evaluate genetic gains in selection for an early MFA transition from juvenile to mature wood, six different regression functions were fitted to the MFA profile of each tree to delineate the age variation in MFA transition.
\nNarrow-sense heritability estimates (ℎ2) ranged from 0.10 to 0.32 for DBH and from 0.18 to 0.76 for wood quality traits. Unfavourable genetic correlations between growth and stiffness were observed, implying that selection for a 1% increase in DBH alone, would confer 5.5% and 2.3% decreases in lodgepole pine MOEs and MOEtof, respectively.
\nResults of the studies in this thesis indicate that simultaneous improvement of DBH and stiffness is achievable when an optimal selection index combining both traits is implemented. Additionally, it is possible to select for an earlier MFA transition from juvenile to mature wood, and thus, decreasing the proportion of the log containing juvenile wood in lodgepole pine selective breeding programs. Finally, G × E was only significant for stiffness within the northern most breeding zone. To achieve the highest stiffness for lodgepole pine, provenances of Yukon origin should be planted at lower latitudes and those of British Columbia (BC) origin should be planted at lower elevations within the tested breeding zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it