MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Considerations in Designing DCI (Data Centre Interconnect) in Full Mesh VPLS/ Multicast Enable WAN over OTV Tunne

2017· article· en· W2808347109 on OpenAlexaff
Arsalan Iqbal, Steve Benoit, Usman Dar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsGeorgian College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer scienceComputer networkInterconnection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

VPLS/ MPLS is one of the most popular Wide Area Network (WAN) technologies used today by service providers.VPLS depends on pseudowires (PW) within Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network to emulate Ethernet connectivity in a full mesh topology, to multiple remote sites, sharing an Ethernet broadcast domain.As IP multicast services continue to be offered, many customers find it desirable to extend their multicast applications to remote sites, where traditional technologies fail to support such connectivity.A layer-2 VPN service using VPLS supports the extension of multicast services to remote sites.In this paper, the impact of a full mesh VPLS with the interoperability of Cisco Overlay Transport Virtualization (OTV) and multicast traffic has been analyzed.The paper concludes that an inadequately designed full mesh VPLS based WAN can have a significant negative impact on overall WAN performance in terms of reachability and packet loss for data, voice, and multicast traffic on the same customer edge (CE) device.The paper further proposes a design solution to avoid drastic impacts on the overall WAN performance when a large amount of multicast traffic is to be transported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computer and Communication EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207