MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808351880 · doi:10.20381/ruor-21883

The Efficacy of Specific Activation of D1-class Dopamine Receptors to Enhance Motor Recovery in Mice Following Cortical Photothrombotic Stroke

2018· dissertation· en· W2808351880 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Annette Gower

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsDopamineStroke (engine)NeuroscienceReceptorMedicineDopamine receptorPsychologyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stroke is a widespread condition, which often leaves survivors with lasting deficits in motor function, however, physical rehabilitation is the only treatment available after the acute period. A large body of preclinical literature suggests dopamine-augmenting drugs, could enhance motor recovery following stroke. Unfortunately, mixed clinical results have prevented the implementation of such treatments, possibly due to the wide variety of G protein-coupled receptors these drugs can activate. Using a mouse photothrombosis stroke model and a battery of motor and sensorimotor behavioural tests, the current study aims to demonstrate proof of principle for the use of D1-class dopamine receptor agonists to enhance poststroke motor recovery and to evaluate the role of aerobic exercise rehabilitation in an asynchronous study design. The effect of light-dark cycle on behavioural outcome (horizontal ladder test, adhesive removal test, cylinder test) and histological outcome (infarct size) in photothrombotic stroke was evaluated in order to optimize the stroke model, but no there was no evidence of differences between strokes occurring during the light or dark period of a mouse’s circadian rhythm. A bioactive, suboptimal dose of D1-agonist dihydrexidine, was determined by evaluating its effect on locomotor activity and its ability to increase expression of immediate early gene c-fos. Using the determined dose, studies evaluating the efficacy of 7-days and 2-days of dihydrexidine administration on poststroke motor recovery, were performed, indicating efficacy of a 7-days, but not of a 2-days, course of treatment. The 7-days dihydrexidine treatment resulted in accelerated recovery as compared to a control group receiving saline. This work demonstrates, for the first time, proof of principle for the use of specific activation of D1-class dopamine receptors to enhance motor recovery following stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207