MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2808492183 · doi:10.2118/190757-ms

Reactive Transport Modelling of a Carbonate Reservoir under Seawater Injection

2018· article· en· W2808492183 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yisheng Hu, Eric Mackay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnergi SimulationHeriot-Watt University
KeywordsCalciteCarbonateSeawaterGeologyBrineCarbonate mineralsDissolutionMineralogyGeochemical modelingGeochemistryGroundwaterChemistryOceanographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Produced water chemical compositional data are collected from a carbonate reservoir which had been flooded by North Seawater for more than 20 years, so there is an opportunity to analyse the large amount of produced water data collected, understand the brine/brine and brine/rock interactions and explore the impact factors behind them. In some publications, core flood experimental tests were performed with chalk cores or carbonate columns in order to make an understanding of possible chemical reactions occurring triggered by injected water with different composition (Seawater, low salinity water or any other brine). However, most of the time the laboratory conditions where core flooding experiments are implemented cannot fully simulate the real reservoir conditions. Therefore, in this study, with the help of the valuable produced water dataset and some basic reservoir properties, a one-dimensional reactive transport model is developed to identify what in situ reactions were taking place in the carbonate reservoir triggered by seawater injection. From the perspective of reservoir mineralogy, calcite, as the dominant mineral in the carbonate reservoir, is relatively more chemically reactive than quartz and feldspar which are usually found in sandstone. Whether calcite is initially and dominantly present in the carbonate reservoir rock is dissolved under seawater flooding or not is the first key issue we focused on. The effects of calcite dissolution on the sulphate scaling reactions due to incompatible brine mixing and the potential occurrence of carbonate mineral precipitation induced by calcite dissolution are investigated and discussed in detail. The comparison of simulation results from the isothermal model and the non-isothermal model show the important role of temperature during geochemical processes. The partitioning of CO2 from the hydrocarbon phase into injected brine was considered through calculation of the composition of reacted seawater equilibrated with the CO2 gas phase with fixed partial pressure (equivalent with CO2 content), then subsequently the impact of CO2 interactions on the calcite, dolomite and huntite mineral reactions are studied and explained. We also use calculation results from the model to match the observed field data to demonstrate the possibility of ion exchange occurring in the chalk reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→