MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808553266

Le quotient intellectuel : ses déterminants et son avenir

2011· book· fr· W2808553266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Serge Larivée

Bibliographic record

VenueEditions MultiMondes eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prepare par une vingtaine d'experts sous la direction du professeur Serge Larivee, de l'Ecole de psychoeducation de l'Universite de Montreal, et s'adressant aux pedagogues, aux psychologues et au grand public cultive, Le quotient intellectuel. Ses determinants et son avenir presente, d'une maniere exhaustive, les connaissances les plus avancees sur le quotient intellectuel, ses determinants et son avenir. La premiere partie de l'ouvrage est consacree a la presentation des approches psychometriques. C'est dans le cadre de ces approches qu'a ete developpe ce qu'on appelle le quotient intellectuel (QI). Situes dans une perspective historique, les faits presentes nous font comprendre dans quel contexte les tests de QI ont ete elabores et ce qu'ils sont devenus au fil du temps. La deuxieme partie porte sur les determinants de l'intelligence, l'analyse genetique en psychologie, l'application de celle-ci a l'etude de l'intelligence, le probleme des effets des contaminants environnementaux (plomb, mercure, etc.) et des drogues (alcool, tabac, marijuana, etc.) sur l'intelligence. Les relations entre la nutrition et l'intelligence sont aussi abordees. On y traite des effets de la denutrition et des carences en fer, en zinc et en iode sur le fonctionnement mental. On y analyse egalement l'impact de l'allaitement maternel sur l'intelligence, les aspects psychosociaux des facteurs environnementaux, les relations entre les classes sociales, la configuration familiale, la reussite scolaire, les pratiques educatives et les consequences cognitives, tout au long de la vie, du fait d'avoir ete un bebe de faible poids. La troisieme partie de l'ouvrage traite des comparaisons entre les sexes et entre les groupes ethniques. Enfin, la derniere partie « L'avenir de l'intelligence », aborde le probleme de la relative stabilite de l'intelligence au cours de la vie d'un individu, celui de l'augmentation des scores de QI entre les generations et traite d'un des mythes les plus ancres dans la population, voulant que nous n'utilisions que 10?% de notre cerveau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEditions MultiMondes eBooksSame topicNutrition, Health, and Society StudiesFrench-language works237,207