Where vulnerability can become a strength: A focused ethnography of a community program for youth exposed to violence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is developing evidence that more effective means for preventing violence should involve social development programs for youths. A focused ethnographic study was conducted over 8 months in a social development program situated in Montreal (Quebec, Canada), aimed at providing support to youths who have been exposed to violence as actors, recipients, or witnesses. The study included participant observation, interviews with youths and staff members, and a review of documents, to examine how the program operates socially and how these social processes affect youths favorably and unfavourably. Youths' experiences with the program were meaningful by permitting them to examine and reflect on who they are, what they have experienced and how to “connect” with others. The safe social space that was created by the youths and coordinators allowed for this meaningful engagement with the program, which led to outcomes that could go beyond the program itself and affected youths' relationships with others, their self-perception, as well as their mental wellbeing . The program contributed to help manage some of the difficulties youths were facing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".