MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808644149 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2838039

Augmented Real-Valued Time-Delay Neural Network for Compensation of Distortions and Impairments in Wireless Transmitters

2018· article· en· W2808644149 on OpenAlexaff
Dongming Wang, Mohsin Aziz, Mohamed Helaoui, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransmitterArtificial neural networkAmplifierWidebandCompensation (psychology)Electronic engineeringNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear distortionAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A digital predistorter, modeled by an augmented real-valued time-delay neural network (ARVTDNN), has been proposed and found suitable to mitigate the nonlinear distortions of the power amplifier (PA) along with modulator imperfections for a wideband direct-conversion transmitter. The input signal of the proposed ARVTDNN consists of Cartesian in-phase and quadrature phase ( I/Q ) components, as well as envelope-dependent terms. Theoretical analysis shows that the proposed model is able to produce a richer basis function containing both the desired odd- and even-order terms, resulting in improved modeling capability and distortion mitigation. Its actual performance has been validated through extensive simulations and experiments. The results show that the compensation and hardware impairment mitigation capabilities of the ARVTDNN are superior to the existing state-of-the-art real-valued focused time-delay neural network (RVFTDNN) by 3-4 dB for the adjacent channel power ratio and by 2-3 dB in terms of the normalized mean square error. Other important features of the proposed model are its reduced complexity, in terms of the number of parameters and floating-point operations, and its improved numerical stability compared to the RVFTDNN model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations230
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning SystemsSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207