MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808721921 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noy059.037

ATRT-40. IMPACT OF MOLECULAR SUBTYPES ON TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN RHABDOID TUMORS - A REPORT FROM THE RARE TUMOR CONSORTIUM

2018· article· en· W2808721921 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Ho, Adriana Fonseca, Salma Al‐Karmi, Ashley Margol, Fupan Yao, Sylvia Cheng, Ronald Grant, Jordan Handsford, Abha A. Gupta, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Bruce Pawel, Nada Jabado, Cynthia Hawkins, Lucie Lafay‐Cousin, Alexander R. Judkins, Éric Bouffet, Annie Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalMcGill UniversityBC Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtypical teratoid rhabdoid tumorOncologyInternal medicineMedicineCancer researchImmunohistochemistryBioinformaticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhabdoid Tumors (RTs) are rare heritable cancers with bi-allelic SMARCB1/A4 alterations, arising in the brain (Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors/ATRTs) and in various extra-cranial locations (Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors/MRTs). Recent studies uncovered molecular sub-types of ATRTs and MRTs, however, the molecular relationship and clinico-pathologic implications of MRTs and ATRTs sub-types remain unclear. To inform clinical understanding of ATRTs and MRTs, 450/850K methylation array profiles generated from 202 ATRTs and 57 MRTs were used to define molecular categories of ATRTs/MRTs and examine their clinical significance. ATRTs segregated into 3 known molecular subgroups, group 1/SHH (n=87), group 2A/TYR (n=69), group 2B/MYC (n= 46); 13 and 44 MRTs respectively segregated with group 2A/TYR and 2B/MYC ATRTs. Median patient age was 19.1 months for group 1/SHH, 12.3 months for group 2A/TYR and 22.3 months for group 2B/MYC Rhabdoid tumors. Complete clinical information and treatment information available for 162 patients (n=125 ATRTs and n=37 MRTs), indicated only 65 patients received a combined chemo-radiation therapy. 24-month PFS was 30%,38% and 28% and the 24-month OS was 43%,48% and 43% for subgroups 1/SHH, 2A/TYR and 2B/MYC tumors respectively. MRT and ATRT comprise a biological spectrum with overlapping molecular features. Clinicopathologic analysis suggest ATRT/MRT molecular subtypes have different therapeutic response to chemo-radiotherapeutic regimens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207