Measurement of Vapor Pressures and Melting Properties of Five Polybrominated Aromatic Flame Retardants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While vapor pressure is among the most important properties used in the environmental fate assessment of organic contaminants, measured vapor pressures exist only for a few representatives of the group of novel brominated flame retardants (BFRs). To expand on this limited set of data, the vapor pressures of five BFRs—1,2,4,5,-tetrabromo-dimethylbenzene (TBX), 1,2,3,4,5-pentabromo-6-methyl-benzene (PBT), 1,2,3,4,5-pentabromo-6-ethyl-benzene (PBEB), 2,3,4,5,6-pentabromo-phenol (PBP), and 1,3,5-tribromo-2(2,3-dibromopropoxy)-benzene (TBP-DBPE)—were measured in the temperature range 322.7–367.7 K with the gas saturation method. Enthalpies of sublimation or vaporization were determined from the slopes of semilogarithmic plots of measured vapor pressure against reciprocal temperature. The melting temperature and enthalpy of fusion were measured using differential scanning calorimetry. From these experimental data, the vapor pressures and subcooled liquid vapor pressures at 298.2 K, pi° and pi°,sl, respectively, were derived and compared with values estimated using group contribution methods, polyparameter linear free energy relationships, as well as EPISuite, SPARC, and COSMOtherm. Depending on the method and compound, deviations between measured and estimated log(pi°) or log(pi°,sl) values ranged from 8 to 77% of the measured values. The gas/particle partitioning behavior of the five BFRs was estimated using the measured pi°,sl values and the Junge–Pankow model. This estimation could account for the observed partitioning behavior of PBT and TBP-DBPE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".