Clinical performance of a three-dimensional saddle-shaped, rigid ring for mitral valve repair†
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Profile 3D annuloplasty ring is a complete, rigid, saddle-shaped ring indicated for reconstruction and/or remodelling of the pathological mitral valve (MV) in patients with mitral insufficiency. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, observational, postmarket release study characterized the patient population for which the study ring was chosen for MV repair, assessed the relief from MV dysfunction and determined the level of mitral regurgitation (MR) at follow-up (6-12 months postimplant). RESULTS: Between February 2013 and July 2015, 151 patients were enrolled at 7 centres; data were excluded for 3 patients. The mean age of the remaining 148 patients was 63.8 ± 12.3 years, and 85 patients (57.4%) were men. Ischaemic cardiomyopathy was present in 15 patients (10.1%) and dilated cardiomyopathy in 12 patients (8.1%). MR was severe in 86 of 145 patients with available data (59.3%). Implantation was successful in 141 of 147 attempted procedures. Two deaths (n = 148, 1.4%) occurred within 30 days, and 1 death (0.7%) occurred >30 days after implant. Analysis of patients with data from both visits (n = 111) demonstrated that MR was none or mild in 94.5% of patients, moderate in 3.6% and moderate to severe in 1.8% at follow-up. Nearly all (104 of 109, 95.4%) patients were in New York Heart Association Class I/II. Among patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy or dilated cardiomyopathy preoperatively, 16 of 19 patients with available data (84.2%) had no or mild MR at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MV repair using the Profile 3D annuloplasty ring is a safe and effective treatment for MR. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy or dilated cardiomyopathy derive unique benefit from this saddle-shaped ring. Clinical trial registration number: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01112566.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".