MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808755030 · doi:10.1061/9780784481684.043

Compacted Unsaturated Soil Behavior in a Large Scale Laboratory Test

2018· article· en· W2808755030 on OpenAlexaff
Corrie Walton-Macaulay, L. Sebastian Bryson, Jason M Curd

Bibliographic record

VenuePanAm Unsaturated Soils 2017 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompactionGeotechnical engineeringWater contentStiffnessVoid ratioSoil waterSuctionLaboratory testEnvironmental scienceMoistureSoil testSoil scienceMaterials scienceGeologyEngineeringComposite materialMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the responsive behavior of an unsaturated clay soil to compaction conditions in a large-scale laboratory test. A laboratory test was developed in order to use a field geo-gauge to measure and observe soil stiffness behaviors. The soil was compacted at water contents ranging from dry to wet of a standard proctor optimum moisture content. Monotonic loading conditions were employed and stiffness measurements were determined with each incremental compaction effort. The responsive behaviors of the mechanical and dynamic properties with changes in void ratio of the compacted soils are discussed. Generally, the resiliency of the soil is shown by increases in stiffness with changes in void ratio due to incremental compaction efforts. An existing method of estimation of matric suction was employed in the analyses of the data. The trends of stiffness and matric suction of the clay based on the large-scale laboratory tests were found to be typical of trends from other generally used laboratory test methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePanAm Unsaturated Soils 2017Same topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207