MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2808856564

Taking it to the Streets: using an open policy environment and outreach to help shape Canada’s national collection

2017· article· en· W2808856564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Science and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachCollection developmentGovernment (linguistics)StakeholderNational archivesPolitical sciencePublic relationsLibrary scienceBusinessWorld Wide WebPublic administrationLawComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In its role as a national library and archives, Library and Archives Canada develops its published collection systematically through Legal Deposit. As a blunt instrument, legal deposit is intended to assure that the published heritage of a nation is acquired and made accessible to current and future generations of clients. However, LAC has become more and more selective in what it acquires on legal deposit, while also understanding that not all the publishers and music producers from whom it would like to acquire material participate in the program. As part of the renewal of its legal deposit program, it has been drafting a new collection development policy for publications, employing traditional consultation with members of its external stakeholder committees - including librarians - as well as an open information environment that leverages new technology to invite a wider audience to participate directly in the policy-making process. Using such open dialogue to build policy is one way in which LAC supports Canada’s objectives on Open Government. While it may be primarily the users of the collection who are most interested in influencing the collection policy, LAC recognizes that the success of the LD program is also intimately connected to another group of stakeholders who use its services: Canadian publishers. Like other national libraries, LAC offers a suite of services to Canadian publishers, including ISBN, ISMN, ISSN issuance, cataloguing-in-publication and legal deposit, and relies upon publishers to help it assemble a valuable and comprehensive record of Canada’s published heritage. To that end, LAC has developed a Publisher Outreach Strategy (POS) in parallel with the collection development policy, with the overarching aim of improving publisher participation in legal deposit. The pillars of the strategy involve rethinking LAC’s approach to business intelligence gathering and dissemination; increasing awareness and use of LAC’s services to publishers; and developing staff capacity to effectively implement the new approach. This paper explores the ways in which LAC is implementing these new ways of doing business to support development of the national collection of publications, the reaction internally and externally to this approach, the advantages and challenges, and the results to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibrary Science and Information SystemsFrench-language works237,207